<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tech Specialist B2C and B2B Marketing Blog from BANNER &#187; ppc</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.b1.com/blog/tag/ppc/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.b1.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:16:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How’s B2B Search Marketing Different?</title>
		<link>http://www.b1.com/blog/2010/10/01/b2b-search-marketing-presentation</link>
		<comments>http://www.b1.com/blog/2010/10/01/b2b-search-marketing-presentation#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 10:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Magnus Nilsson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presentations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.b1.com/blog/?p=767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With a long history in B2B marketing, we’ve developed a thorough understanding of how to approach this sector in most marketing disciplines. And paid search is no different. A couple of weeks back we flew over to Oslo to share some of our insights at the largest search marketing conference in the Nordics. Below are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a long history in B2B marketing, we’ve developed a thorough understanding of how to approach this sector in most marketing disciplines. And paid search is no different. A couple of weeks back we flew over to Oslo to share some of our insights at the largest <a class="-blank" href="http://semkonferansen.no">search marketing conference</a> in the Nordics. Below are the slides from our presentation. Enjoy.</p>
<h3>Search Marketing for Business to Business</h3>
<div id="__ss_5323725" style="width: 425px;"><object id="__sse5323725" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="355" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=b2bsearchmarketingbannercorporation-100930083925-phpapp01&amp;stripped_title=search-marketing-for-business-to-business&amp;userName=BannerCorporation" /><param name="name" value="__sse5323725" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed id="__sse5323725" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" src="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=b2bsearchmarketingbannercorporation-100930083925-phpapp01&amp;stripped_title=search-marketing-for-business-to-business&amp;userName=BannerCorporation" name="__sse5323725" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<div style="padding: 5px 0 12px;">View more presentations from <a class="-blank" href="http://www.slideshare.net/BannerCorporation">BANNER</a>.</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.b1.com/blog/2010/10/01/b2b-search-marketing-presentation/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Instant’s Impact on Search Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.b1.com/blog/2010/09/10/google-instants-impact-on-search-marketing</link>
		<comments>http://www.b1.com/blog/2010/09/10/google-instants-impact-on-search-marketing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Magnus Nilsson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.b1.com/blog/?p=567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By now you’ve probably heard of or even tried out Google’s latest search innovation — Google Instant. The new feature leverages Google’s deep search insights and data crunching abilities to try predict what users are searching for and serve results even before they’ve finished writing. As users are typing their query Google is constantly refreshing the website [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>By now you’ve probably heard of or even tried out Google’s latest search innovation — Google Instant.</strong> The new feature leverages Google’s deep search insights and data crunching abilities to try predict what users are searching for and serve results even before they’ve finished writing. As users are typing their query Google is constantly refreshing the website with predicted results.</p>
<p>While it has just been rolled out in the UK and US to users logged into Google this week, and so empirical data is scarce, there are at least two early indications to how this will impact search marketing:</p>
<p><strong>Paid search is getting increasingly important for brands that want to be found</strong>. With the latest update Google is further pushing the organic (non-paid for) results further down the page.</p>
<p><strong>Impression counts will go up</strong>. Any predictive search result that is shown for more than three seconds will count as an impression. This will undoubtedly inflate impression volumes in particular for head terms that are frequently used in beginning of search queries. Exactly how this in turn will impact click-through-rates and cost-per-click is yet to be seen.</p>
<p><em>What do you think of Google instant — love it or hate it?</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.b1.com/blog/2010/09/10/google-instants-impact-on-search-marketing/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet us in Stockholm, Oslo (and London)</title>
		<link>http://www.b1.com/blog/2010/08/20/meet-us-in-london-stockholm-and-oslo</link>
		<comments>http://www.b1.com/blog/2010/08/20/meet-us-in-london-stockholm-and-oslo#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 12:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Magnus Nilsson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speaking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.b1.com/blog/?p=453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s speaking season at the Banner search team, and over the next couple of months we’ll be speaking at conferences in London, Stockholm and Oslo. First out is SEM Konferansen in Oslo (14–16 September). Here we’ll run a couple of sessions with a main one-hour event dedicated to share our insights on B2B search marketing. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>It’s speaking season at the Banner search team, and over the next couple of months we’ll be speaking at conferences in London, Stockholm and Oslo.</strong></p>
<p>First out is <strong><a href="http://www.semkonferansen.no/" class="-blank">SEM Konferansen</a></strong> in Oslo (14–16 September). Here we’ll run a couple of sessions with a main one-hour event dedicated to share our insights on B2B search marketing.</p>
<p>Following this we’ll continue our Nordic journey and venture across the border to Stockholm and the world-renowned <strong><a href="http://searchmarketingexpo.com/stockholm" class="-blank">SMX</a></strong> (28–29 September). With no-less than three speaking sessions penned in it’ll be a busy couple of days.  We’ll be digging into the Google quality score and how to integrate search and display advertising.</p>
<p>Back in London we’re running a retargeting session at the always-excellent <strong><a href="http://www.a4uexpo.com/london/" class="-blank">A4UExpo</a></strong> (12–13 October). This is the premier UK event for affiliate and performance marketing, and a brilliant opportunity to understand more about this exciting marketing model.</p>
<p>If you’re planning to attend any of the above events, please write a line in the comments as we’re always happy to catch-up over coffee in-between sessions. Otherwise you’ll surely find us networking in the bar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.b1.com/blog/2010/08/20/meet-us-in-london-stockholm-and-oslo/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Updates Trademark Policies</title>
		<link>http://www.b1.com/blog/2010/08/04/google-trademark-policy-uk-eu</link>
		<comments>http://www.b1.com/blog/2010/08/04/google-trademark-policy-uk-eu#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 09:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Magnus Nilsson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.b1.com/blog/?p=426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has announced that it is changing its ad policies to allow advertisers to use third party trademarks in their ad copies, even without approval from the trademark owner. The change is aimed at allowing reseller and component seller etc, to clearly communicate the brands they sell or support. The policy is already in place [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has announced that it is changing its ad policies to allow advertisers to use third party trademarks in their ad copies, even without approval from the trademark owner. The change is aimed at allowing reseller and component seller etc, to clearly communicate the brands they sell or support.</p>
<p>The policy is already in place in the US, and will soon extend to the UK, Ireland and Canada.</p>
<p>Furthermore, as a consequence of Google’s recent win over Louis Vuitton in the European Court of Justice and also French High Court that allowed competitive trademark keyword bidding, this will now be opened up across the EU. This is already the case in most other markets such as the UK.</p>
<p>Both policy changes are planned to come into effect on 14 September.</p>
<p>Read the full <a class="-blank" href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/2010/08/update-to-canadian-uk-and-ireland-ad.html">press release</a>.</p>
<div class="cbw snap_nopreview">
<div class="cbw_header">
<script src="http://www.crunchbase.com/javascripts/widget.js" type="text/javascript"></script></p>
<div class="cbw_header_text"><a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/" class="-blank">CrunchBase Information</a></div>
</div>
<div class="cbw_content">
<div class="cbw_subheader"><a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/company/google" class="-blank">Google</a></div>
<div class="cbw_subcontent"><script src="http://www.crunchbase.com/cbw/company/google.js" type="text/javascript"></script></div>
<div class="cbw_footer">Information provided by <a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/" class="-blank">CrunchBase</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.b1.com/blog/2010/08/04/google-trademark-policy-uk-eu/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Matching Landing Pages by Search Intent</title>
		<link>http://www.b1.com/blog/2010/05/27/matching-landing-pages-by-search-intent</link>
		<comments>http://www.b1.com/blog/2010/05/27/matching-landing-pages-by-search-intent#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 11:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Magnus Nilsson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://b1blog.com/?p=393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Search is sometimes referred to as the “database of intent”. The reason is simple – never before have prospects so clearly told advertisers what they want before they arrive at the site. The trick is to maximise this opportunity. The concept of deep-linking isn’t specific to search. It applies to all online marketing activity, such [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Search is sometimes referred to as the “database of intent”. The reason is simple – never before have prospects so clearly told advertisers what they want before they arrive at the site. The trick is to maximise this opportunity.</strong></p>
<p>The concept of deep-linking isn’t specific to search. It applies to all online marketing activity, such as display, email and social. The difference however, is that the <strong>search phrase is an additional data point</strong> that should be used to <strong>segment and effectively funnel</strong> the user towards desired action.</p>
<p>Consider the site structure below for a moment:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/48017941@N07/4644669602/"><img class="aligncenter" title="Site Map example" src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4024/4644669602_df5f049f6c_o.png" alt="" width="208" height="250" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Just a few years ago, it wasn’t rare to find campaigns that were all pointing to the home page (or worse, the many times severely limited internal site search functionality).</p>
<p><strong>The first issue</strong> with this approach, is that someone arriving from a specific search such as “product x specs” <strong>will not immediately see the product they are expecting</strong>, and possibly just hit the back button in frustration and appear as a “bounce” in the site analytics.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Secondly</strong>, even if they are determined enough, and decide to give the site a second chance, they still have to find their way through via internal navigation and search functionality. This <strong>leaves them vulnerable to getting lost</strong>, frustrated and ultimately giving up, and return to their search engine of choice for a better match to their original query.</p>
<p>Simplistically, there are two levels of segmentation when it comes to keywords and landing pages:</p>
<ol>
<li>Type: e.g. Category, Product, Service</li>
<li>Intent: e.g. buy, compare, complain, trouble shoot</li>
</ol>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>At the first level</strong>, advertisers will send category searches (e.g. “printers”) to a category page, and product specific searches (e.g. “brand X model Y”) to the product page. Isn’t that nice and simple?</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>At the second leve</strong>l, the advertiser will utilise the search modifiers to better understand what the consumer wants. E.g. a search for “brand X model Y specifications”) will send traffic to the corresponding sub page or section of the landing page.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">While this might seem like common sense and straight forward to implement, there are a few things to consider. The second level of segmentation <strong>increases the complexity of the campaign</strong> by quickly multiplying the number of individual landing pages. These individual landing pages need to be checked so they are up to date, accessible and have the required call to action for up sell or cross-sell.</p>
<p>In return when all stars align, advertisers can expect <strong>happier site visitors</strong> and <strong>improved conversion rates</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.b1.com/blog/2010/05/27/matching-landing-pages-by-search-intent/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Search is about Humans, not Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.b1.com/blog/2010/04/27/search-is-about-humans-not-technology</link>
		<comments>http://www.b1.com/blog/2010/04/27/search-is-about-humans-not-technology#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 12:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Magnus Nilsson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://b1blog.com/?p=383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even if search has matured incredibly over the last few years, both from a technical point of view and as a channel that gains board room level attention, a lot of the basic issues remain the same. I’m not talking about cross-channel click attribution and lifetime value, but campaign coordination and achieving the appropriate buy-in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Even if search has matured incredibly over the last few years, both from a technical point of view and as a channel that gains board room level attention, a lot of the basic issues remain the same.</strong> I’m not talking about cross-channel click attribution and lifetime value, but campaign coordination and achieving the appropriate buy-in at all levels of the organisation.</p>
<p>Earlier this year Banner organised a Search Huddle. This was an intimate session for B2B marketers with speakers from Autodesk, Avaya, and Microsoft.</p>
<div class="mceTemp mceIEcenter">
<dl class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 509px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><img title="Humans and Robots" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3535/3289851965_b616322537_o.jpg" alt="( Photo cc by Emelie Ogez )" width="499" height="310" /><br />
( Photo cc by Emelie Ogez )</dt>
</dl>
</div>
<p>While the event was rounded off by Cedric Chambaz, marketing manager at Microsoft and myself, by looking at the latest developments of search and what lies ahead, what generated the most debate was how to <strong>get the fundamentals right</strong>; what can you do today, to make a tangible difference to achieve your objectives?</p>
<p>Dominic Jukes, web marketing manager at Autodesk shared his experience of<strong> managing international paid search campaigns</strong>, and highlighted recent corporate structural changes that had helped facilitate increased ownership and subsequent coordination of their search marketing efforts.</p>
<p>Avaya, represented by editor-in-chief Jerome Toulorge, used paid search in a different innovative fashion. With the objective of <strong>generating sales through their channel partners</strong>, together we had created a paid search reseller program that was rolled-out with selected partners across Europe. The challenges faced where not so much about technology as it was about communication and education.</p>
<p>The event clearly highlighted that although search can many times be perceived as a highly technology focused marketing channel; <strong>the biggest factor to success is still the people driving it</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.b1.com/blog/2010/04/27/search-is-about-humans-not-technology/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The double-edged sword of PPC click-through</title>
		<link>http://www.b1.com/blog/2010/04/12/the-double-edged-sword-of-ppc-click-through</link>
		<comments>http://www.b1.com/blog/2010/04/12/the-double-edged-sword-of-ppc-click-through#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Magnus Nilsson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://b1blog.com/?p=369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With search engines charging for clicks and not impressions and typically being considered a direct response channel, you may be forgiven to think that there’s little need to optimise for click-through rate (CTR). However, since CTR is the majority factor to determine the so-called quality score, which impacts the cost-per-click (CPC), this will affect the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>With search engines charging for clicks and not impressions and typically being considered a direct response channel, you may be forgiven to think that there’s little need to optimise for click-through rate (CTR)</strong>. However, since CTR is the majority factor to determine the so-called quality score, which impacts the cost-per-click (CPC), this will affect the success of the campaign; regardless of if objectives are sales, leads or traffic.</p>
<p>Why are search engines doing this? The adverts CTR is an important <strong>signal of “quality”</strong> for search engines. The logic is that if the advert matches the users query, they will click it. Therefore the higher the CTR, the more relevant the advert is assumed to be. And of course, since the search engines charge advertisers per click, their revenue increases.</p>
<p>The following chart outlines the main factors that determine the quality score for a keyword on Google Adwords. This quality score is then used in an algorithm that <strong>determines click-cost and position</strong>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="Google Quality Score Factors pie chart" src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4065/4514293541_cc77deeece_o.png" alt="" width="237" height="220" /></p>
<p>Due to this, it’s very possible that <strong>an advert appearing in top position is paying less per click than the one below</strong>. The search engines are of course maximising their revenues by the higher number of aggregate clicks that the top CTR advert is producing.</p>
<p>To make things more complex for advertisers, consider the following scenario: an advert with lower <strong>CTR is converting very strongly on the website</strong>, as it effectively pre-qualifies the traffic. In comparison a <strong>high CTR advert for the same campaign converts poorer</strong>, as it doesn’t seek to filter out unwanted traffic at the ad level, but instead on the landing page. Which should you run?</p>
<p>At this stage you would need to calculate the actual cost-per-action and volumes that can be achieved, depending on objective.</p>
<table style="border: 1px solid #000000; font-size: 12px;" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td><strong>Max bid</strong></td>
<td><strong>CTR</strong></td>
<td><strong>Quality Score</strong></td>
<td><strong>Actual CPC</strong></td>
<td><strong>Conversion Rate</strong></td>
<td><strong>CPA</strong></td>
<td><strong>Volume<br />
(at on 2k<br />
impressions)</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Ad 1</strong></td>
<td>£5</td>
<td>3%</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>£3</td>
<td>5%</td>
<td>£60</td>
<td>3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Ad 2</strong></td>
<td>£5</td>
<td>2%</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>£5</td>
<td>10%</td>
<td>£50</td>
<td>4</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>In practise, it’s <strong>difficult to make this type of direct comparison</strong> on a live campaign, due to the ever-changing nature of competition, quality score, positions and costs. However, from experience, typically for b2c <strong>the benefit of a higher quality score from optimising ad copies towards CTR</strong> (with resulting lowered CPC and higher position) <strong>outweighs the alternative, whereas for B2B it might not be the case</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.b1.com/blog/2010/04/12/the-double-edged-sword-of-ppc-click-through/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

