B1BLOG

The double-edged sword of PPC click-through

With search engines char­ging for clicks and not impres­sions and typ­ic­ally being con­sidered a dir­ect response chan­nel, you may be for­given to think that there’s little need to optim­ise for click-through rate (CTR). How­ever, since CTR is the major­ity factor to determ­ine the so-called qual­ity score, which impacts the cost-per-click (CPC), this will affect the suc­cess of the cam­paign; regard­less of if object­ives are sales, leads or traffic.

Why are search engines doing this? The adverts CTR is an import­ant sig­nal of “qual­ity” for search engines. The logic is that if the advert matches the users query, they will click it. There­fore the higher the CTR, the more rel­ev­ant the advert is assumed to be. And of course, since the search engines charge advert­isers per click, their rev­enue increases.

The fol­low­ing chart out­lines the main factors that determ­ine the qual­ity score for a keyword on Google Adwords. This qual­ity score is then used in an algorithm that determ­ines click-cost and pos­i­tion.

Due to this, it’s very pos­sible that an advert appear­ing in top pos­i­tion is pay­ing less per click than the one below. The search engines are of course max­im­ising their rev­en­ues by the higher num­ber of aggreg­ate clicks that the top CTR advert is producing.

To make things more com­plex for advert­isers, con­sider the fol­low­ing scen­ario: an advert with lower CTR is con­vert­ing very strongly on the web­site, as it effect­ively pre-qualifies the traffic. In com­par­ison a high CTR advert for the same cam­paign con­verts poorer, as it doesn’t seek to fil­ter out unwanted traffic at the ad level, but instead on the land­ing page. Which should you run?

At this stage you would need to cal­cu­late the actual cost-per-action and volumes that can be achieved, depend­ing on objective.

Max bid CTR Qual­ity Score Actual CPC Con­ver­sion Rate CPA Volume
(at on 2k
impressions)
Ad 1 £5 3% 10 £3 5% £60 3
Ad 2 £5 2% 5 £5 10% £50 4

In prac­tise, it’s dif­fi­cult to make this type of dir­ect com­par­ison on a live cam­paign, due to the ever-changing nature of com­pet­i­tion, qual­ity score, pos­i­tions and costs. How­ever, from exper­i­ence, typ­ic­ally for b2c the bene­fit of a higher qual­ity score from optim­ising ad cop­ies towards CTR (with res­ult­ing lowered CPC and higher pos­i­tion) out­weighs the altern­at­ive, whereas for B2B it might not be the case.

5 Responses to “The double-edged sword of PPC click-through”

  1. […] This post was men­tioned on Twit­ter by Wul­fric Wilkin­son, Mag­nus Nils­son. Mag­nus Nils­son said: b1blog.com > The Double-edged Sword of PPC click-through rate http://b1blog.com/?p=369 #sem […]

  2. Irfan Danawala says:

    I came across your post via linkedin. Great info i must say..thanks. Do you have a news­let­ter of your site which i can sub­scribe to?

  3. Irfan, thanks for the feed­back. No news­let­ter yet, but will sug­gest get­ting it imple­men­ted through feed­burner shortly.

  4. physical therapist says:

    Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed brows­ing your blog posts. In any case I’ll be sub­scrib­ing to your feed and I hope you write again soon!

  5. Jamie Shields says:

    Hi Irfan, you can now sub­scribe to both this, and our Insights blog through feedburner:

    http://feeds.feedburner.com/B1-BannerBlog
    http://feeds.feedburner.com/Banner-Insights-WeKnowTechnologyBuyersInsideOut

Leave a Reply